Andrew Robinson / Work / UKG Redesign

UKG Homepage
& UX Redesign

Rebuilding the system front door so 700+ employees could actually find what they needed

Type System UX
Platform UKG Pro & WFM
Audience All staff · Executives
Live
Problem
Default UKG navigation didn't match real workflows
Approach
Role-based redesign for all 4 audience types
Impact
Higher adoption · Less support friction · Better engagement
The problem

Out-of-the-box UKG is built
for everyone — which means no one

When UKG Pro ships, its default homepage is a generic launchpad — every module, every link, everything visible to every user regardless of their role. For a large, multi-function organization, that creates real friction: employees can't find time-off requests, managers wade through HR admin menus, and executives see payroll configuration screens they'll never use.

The result is low adoption, a spike in HR support tickets for things the system can already do, and a workforce that defaults to emailing HR directly instead of using self-service tools. The system was capable — the interface was just working against people.

The core issue: a single generic homepage serving employees, managers, HR admins, and executives — four completely different user types with four completely different needs.

The approach

Four audiences, four
completely different homepages

The redesign started with a discovery process — not with the system, but with the people using it. I mapped what each audience type actually needed to do when they opened UKG, what they were searching for, and what they were calling HR about because they couldn't find it themselves.

From there, I configured four distinct homepage experiences using UKG Pro's native homepage builder — each one surfacing only the tiles, quick actions, and navigation relevant to that role. No custom code, no third-party tools — just precise configuration of what UKG already supports, applied with a clear design rationale.

Employees
Time off, pay stubs, benefits enrollment, personal info updates. Fast self-service without navigating admin menus.
Time & attendance My pay Benefits
Managers
Team approvals, scheduling, headcount visibility, and performance tools — without seeing payroll config or HR admin modules.
Team approvals Scheduling My team
HR Admins
Payroll runs, onboarding queues, compliance tasks, reporting, and system configuration all surfaced front and center.
Payroll Onboarding Compliance
Executives
Workforce analytics, headcount summaries, and high-level dashboards — no operational noise, just the data needed for decisions.
Analytics Headcount Workforce insights
What changed

The system people avoided
became the system people used

The most immediate signal was a drop in HR support tickets for tasks employees could already do in the system — time-off requests, pay stub downloads, benefits questions. When people can find the thing in two clicks, they stop emailing HR about it.

For managers, surfacing approvals and scheduling front and center reduced the time between an employee submitting a request and a manager acting on it. For executives, having workforce data accessible without navigating through HR admin menus changed how leadership engaged with the system day-to-day.

📉
Reduced HR support tickets
Employees found self-service tasks faster — fewer calls and emails to HR for things UKG already handled.
Faster manager workflows
Approvals, scheduling, and team views surfaced immediately — no digging through menus to find daily tasks.
📊
Executive data access
Leadership could access workforce analytics directly from the homepage without routing through HR.
🎯
Higher system adoption
A homepage that matched real workflows made UKG feel like a tool people wanted to use, not a system they had to use.
Reflection

Good configuration is invisible

The best outcome of this project is that no one talks about it. When a system is configured well, users don't notice the design — they just find what they need. The measure of success here wasn't applause; it was silence from the HR inbox.

This project also reinforced that HRIS work is UX work. Every configuration decision is a design decision. The question isn't just "does the system support this feature" — it's "does the way we've set it up match how the people using it actually think?"


Next case study
Automated workforce analytics pipeline